Unexplained explosion and fire destroy world’s second largest pharmaceutical factory producing precursors for hydroxychloroquine
II Peer reviewed Studies & Physician Commentaries
Early treatment: 100% of studies report positive effects. 65% improvement from meta analysis, p<0.0001.
•HCQ is effective for COVID-19. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 180 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 12 quadrillion (p = 0.000000000000000084).
•Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of studies reporting a positive effect and an estimated reduction of 65% in the effect measured (death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.35 [0.26-0.45].
•91% of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early, PrEP, or PEP treatment report positive effects, the probability of this happening for an ineffective treatment is 0.0059.
•There is evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 88% of prospective studies report positive effects, and only 78% of retrospective studies do.
•Studies from North America are 3.8 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined, p = 0.000002.
Prestigious Medical Journal Publishes Letter Showing Success of Hydroxychloroquine as COVID-19 Treatment
After 440,000 Americans reportedly died, mainstream media and Big Tech finally admit hydroxychloroquine works
WA Times: Hydroxychloroquine rated ‘most effective therapy’ by doctors for coronavirus: Global survey
Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Zinc Triple-Combo Proved to be Effective in Coronavirus Patients, Study Says
“Within Days I Was Able To Breathe”: NYC Democratic Councilman Says Hydroxychloroquine Saved His Life
Yale Epidemiologist: Hydroxychloroquine Should Be ‘Widely Available And Promoted Immediately’ As Standard Treatment
III Fraud Regarding HCQ Was Committed TO Harm Trump And Increase The Body Count
After publishing now-retracted fake science study bashing hydroxychloroquine, discredited science journal The Lancet endorses Joe Biden as “healthy” choice for America
American Medical Association Rescinds Hydroxychloroquine Prevention Order — How Many People Died Because These Soulless Hacks Wanted to Hurt Trump?
Big Pharma “Criminal” Influence On Research Exposed In Secret Recording Of Lancet And NEJM Editors-In-Chief
Why did Fauci CHEER when hydroxychloroquine was used in 2013 for MERS, but is now skeptical for coronavirus?
LancetGate: “Scientific corona lies” and Big Pharma corruption. Hydroxychloroquine versus Gilead’sRemdesivir
Public health expert reveals the FDA and Fauci’s shocking plot to bury hydroxychloroquine as potential COVID-19 cure
CLAIM: Pharma giant Gilead sent death threats to French doctor for telling the world that hydroxychloroquine cures COVID-19
IV Media Lies About Hydroxychloroquine
CNN: “President Trump is wrong in so many ways about hydroxychloroquine studies. Here are the facts.” — Can anyone remember the last time CNN published ‘facts’ about anything subject having anything at all to do with Donald Trump? Neither can we.
The Washington Post: “For Fox News hosts, the hydroxychloroquine controversy is fuel for the culture war.” — The Post, which has been so wrong on practically everything having to do with the president and his administration, couldn’t resist taking a dig at the No. 1 cable news outlet while also bashing Trump and hydroxychloroquine. And by the way, hydroxychloroquine use is only “controversial” because these media sycophants have declared it so.
The Verge: “Trump’s chloroquine hype is a misinformation problem bigger than social media.” We checked and there are no medical researchers or patients who have been given the drug and recovered involved in the writing of this story. We did find this line in the story, though: “There’s been a study with tentatively positive results (and some serious limitations), but also a few studies that show little to no therapeutic effect.”
The New Republic: “How Hydroxychloroquine Became Conservative Media’s Coronavirus Miracle Drug.” Right. It’s a “conservative media drug.” Can you say “lame?”